Recent filings
★ Ronald Hansen v. Dashing Diva USA, Corp.
Florida resident Ronald Hansen is suing Dashing Diva USA, a nail and beauty products company, on behalf of himself and a proposed class of Florida consumers who received promotional text messages from the company. The complaint alleges that Dashing Diva violated the Florida Telephone Solicitation Act by transmitting a phone number, specifically the short code 73707, that was incapable of receiving telephone calls to recipients' caller identification services when it sent text message sales promotions. Florida law requires that any phone number transmitted during a telephonic sales call must be one that consumers can actually call back. The proposed class covers all Florida residents whose caller ID service received such a non-callable number during Dashing Diva text message marketing campaigns in the four years before the complaint was filed. Plaintiffs seek $500 in liquidated damages per violation, plus injunctive relief.
Colby v. Abbott Laboratories
This lawsuit was filed in District Court, N.D. Illinois on November 9, 2026. The court docket classifies it as "Other Fraud" and lists the cause of action as "Diversity-Fraud". The complaint has not yet been read, so the specific allegations and the proposed class are not described here. This note will be replaced with a summary once the complaint is available.
Andrews v. Ally Financial Inc.
This lawsuit was filed in District Court, C.D. California on November 9, 2026. The court docket classifies it as "Consumer Credit" and lists the cause of action as "Fair Credit Reporting Act". The complaint has not yet been read, so the specific allegations and the proposed class are not described here. This note will be replaced with a summary once the complaint is available.
NEWELL v. FLEXIBLE FINANCE, INC.
This lawsuit was filed in District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania on November 9, 2026. The court docket classifies it as "Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA)" and lists the cause of action as "Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment". The complaint has not yet been read, so the specific allegations and the proposed class are not described here. This note will be replaced with a summary once the complaint is available.
McGreevey v. GOLDMAN SACHS BANK, USA
This lawsuit was filed in District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania on November 6, 2026. The court docket classifies it as "Other Statutes: Consumer Credit" and lists the cause of action as "Truth in Lending". The complaint has not yet been read, so the specific allegations and the proposed class are not described here. This note will be replaced with a summary once the complaint is available.
★ Howell v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
Elizabeth Howell, a New York resident, is suing Costco Wholesale on behalf of a proposed nationwide class of shoppers. The complaint alleges that Costco, as importer of record, passed the cost of tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) on to customers by raising prices, including on U.S.-sourced goods that were never subject to the tariffs. After the Supreme Court held those tariffs invalid in February 2026, importers became entitled to refunds from the federal government. The complaint alleges that Costco can collect those refunds while keeping the higher prices its customers already paid, and has made no commitment to return the money. The proposed class covers people who bought tariffed imported goods, or U.S.-sourced goods at prices raised to offset tariff costs, from Costco between February 4, 2025 and February 20, 2026. The claims are unjust enrichment, money had and received, and New York General Business Law sections 349 and 350.
Camacho v. McDonald's Corporation
This lawsuit was filed in District Court, N.D. Illinois on November 6, 2026. The court docket classifies it as "Other Fraud" and lists the cause of action as "Diversity-Fraud". The complaint has not yet been read, so the specific allegations and the proposed class are not described here. This note will be replaced with a summary once the complaint is available.
Penning, Stacy v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company SI
This lawsuit was filed in District Court, W.D. Wisconsin on November 6, 2026. The court docket classifies it as "Other Statutory Actions" and lists the cause of action as "Fed. Question". The complaint has not yet been read, so the specific allegations and the proposed class are not described here. This note will be replaced with a summary once the complaint is available.
McLaughlin v. Revolve Group, Inc.
This lawsuit was filed in District Court, C.D. California on November 6, 2026. The court docket classifies it as "P.I.: Other" and lists the cause of action as "Diversity-Personal Injury". The complaint has not yet been read, so the specific allegations and the proposed class are not described here. This note will be replaced with a summary once the complaint is available.
ALTMAN v. CAPITAL ONE
This lawsuit was filed in District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania on November 6, 2026. The court docket classifies it as "Other Statutes: Consumer Credit" and lists the cause of action as "Fair Credit Reporting Act". The complaint has not yet been read, so the specific allegations and the proposed class are not described here. This note will be replaced with a summary once the complaint is available.
Doe - 39 v. Apple, Inc.
This lawsuit was filed in District Court, N.D. California on November 4, 2026. The court docket classifies it as "Personal Inj. Prod. Liability" and lists the cause of action as "Diversity-(Citizenship)". The complaint has not yet been read, so the specific allegations and the proposed class are not described here. This note will be replaced with a summary once the complaint is available.
Doe - 25 v. Apple, Inc.
This lawsuit was filed in District Court, N.D. California on November 4, 2026. The court docket classifies it as "Personal Inj. Prod. Liability" and lists the cause of action as "Diversity-(Citizenship)". The complaint has not yet been read, so the specific allegations and the proposed class are not described here. This note will be replaced with a summary once the complaint is available.
Baltazar v. Revolve Group, Inc.
This lawsuit was filed in District Court, C.D. California on November 4, 2026. The court docket classifies it as "Contract: Other" and lists the cause of action as "Civil Miscellaneous Case". The complaint has not yet been read, so the specific allegations and the proposed class are not described here. This note will be replaced with a summary once the complaint is available.
RICCA v. TRUEACCORD CORP.
This lawsuit was filed in District Court, D. New Jersey on November 4, 2026. The court docket classifies it as "Consumer Credit" and lists the cause of action as "Fair Debt Collection Act". The complaint has not yet been read, so the specific allegations and the proposed class are not described here. This note will be replaced with a summary once the complaint is available.
ANDERSON v. FRONTLINE TECHNOLOGIES GROUP LLC D/B/A FRONTLINE EDUCATION
This lawsuit was filed in District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania on November 2, 2026. The court docket classifies it as "Contract: Other" and lists the cause of action as "Diversity-Other Contract". The complaint has not yet been read, so the specific allegations and the proposed class are not described here. This note will be replaced with a summary once the complaint is available.
Laurency v. Kenny's Candy & Confections, Inc.
This lawsuit was filed in District Court, S.D. New York on November 2, 2026. The court docket classifies it as "Other Fraud" and lists the cause of action as "Diversity-Fraud". The complaint has not yet been read, so the specific allegations and the proposed class are not described here. This note will be replaced with a summary once the complaint is available.
Talbot v. The Lagunitas Brewing Company
This lawsuit was filed in District Court, N.D. California on November 2, 2026. The court docket classifies it as "Other Fraud" and lists the cause of action as "Diversity-Fraud". The complaint has not yet been read, so the specific allegations and the proposed class are not described here. This note will be replaced with a summary once the complaint is available.
Morris v. Truist Financial Corporation
This lawsuit was filed in District Court, W.D. North Carolina on November 1, 2026. The court docket classifies it as "Contract: Other" and lists the cause of action as "Diversity-Contract Dispute". The complaint has not yet been read, so the specific allegations and the proposed class are not described here. This note will be replaced with a summary once the complaint is available.
De La Pena v. Dunkin Brands, Inc.
This lawsuit was filed in District Court, D. Massachusetts on October 30, 2026. The court docket classifies it as "Other Fraud" and lists the cause of action as "Diversity-Fraud". The complaint has not yet been read, so the specific allegations and the proposed class are not described here. This note will be replaced with a summary once the complaint is available.
CLAIN v. UPWARD ADVANCE LLC
This lawsuit was filed in District Court, District of Columbia on October 30, 2026. The court docket classifies it as "Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA)" and lists the cause of action as "Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment". The complaint has not yet been read, so the specific allegations and the proposed class are not described here. This note will be replaced with a summary once the complaint is available.
Cartagena v. TrueAccord Corp.
This lawsuit was filed in District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania on October 30, 2026. The court docket classifies it as "Other Statutes: Consumer Credit" and lists the cause of action as "Fair Debt Collection Act". The complaint has not yet been read, so the specific allegations and the proposed class are not described here. This note will be replaced with a summary once the complaint is available.
Munoz v. LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc.
This lawsuit was filed in District Court, C.D. California on October 30, 2026. The court docket classifies it as "Other Statutory Actions" and lists the cause of action as "Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle". The complaint has not yet been read, so the specific allegations and the proposed class are not described here. This note will be replaced with a summary once the complaint is available.
KRALL v. WEBEYECARE, INC.
This lawsuit was filed in District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania on October 29, 2026. The court docket classifies it as "Other Statutes: Other Statutory Actions" and lists the cause of action as "Wiretapping". The complaint has not yet been read, so the specific allegations and the proposed class are not described here. This note will be replaced with a summary once the complaint is available.
Phipps v. South East Client Services Inc.
This lawsuit was filed in District Court, W.D. Texas on October 28, 2026. The court docket classifies it as "Consumer Credit" and lists the cause of action as "Fair Debt Collection Act". The complaint has not yet been read, so the specific allegations and the proposed class are not described here. This note will be replaced with a summary once the complaint is available.
Delacruz v. Da-Vinci Paint Company, Inc.
A consumer has filed a class action lawsuit against Da-Vinci Paint Company under the Americans with Disabilities Act, alleging that the company has failed to provide equal access to individuals with disabilities. While the specific details of the complaint are not fully outlined here, ADA cases of this nature typically involve allegations that a company's physical locations, website, or services are not accessible to people with physical or visual impairments, preventing them from fully using the company's products or services in the same way non-disabled customers can. The proposed class would likely include individuals with qualifying disabilities who were denied equal access to Da-Vinci Paint Company's offerings and experienced discrimination as a result of the company's alleged failure to meet ADA compliance standards.
Delacruz v. SJS Commercial, LLC
A consumer has filed a class action lawsuit against SJS Commercial under the Americans with Disabilities Act, alleging that the company has failed to provide equal access to individuals with disabilities. The lawsuit likely centers on physical or digital barriers that prevent disabled individuals from fully accessing the defendant's goods or services, such as inaccessible facilities, websites, or accommodations. The plaintiff claims these failures violate federal disability rights protections and seeks to represent a class of similarly situated individuals with disabilities who have been denied equal access. The suit aims to compel the company to bring its operations into compliance with ADA requirements and potentially recover damages or other relief on behalf of affected class members.
Miller v. Kasper Group LLC
This lawsuit was filed in District Court, S.D. New York on October 27, 2026. The court docket classifies it as "Other Statutory Actions" and lists the cause of action as "Fed. Question". The complaint has not yet been read, so the specific allegations and the proposed class are not described here. This note will be replaced with a summary once the complaint is available.
Badalian v. Citibank, N.A.
This lawsuit was filed in District Court, C.D. California on October 23, 2026. The court docket classifies it as "Consumer Credit" and lists the cause of action as "Electronic Funds Transfer Act". The complaint has not yet been read, so the specific allegations and the proposed class are not described here. This note will be replaced with a summary once the complaint is available.
Dickson v. JM Bullion Inc
This lawsuit was filed in District Court, N.D. Texas on October 23, 2026. The court docket classifies it as "Contract: Other Contract" and lists the cause of action as "Diversity-Other Contract". The complaint has not yet been read, so the specific allegations and the proposed class are not described here. This note will be replaced with a summary once the complaint is available.
Ali v. Garza Food Ventures
This lawsuit was filed in District Court, C.D. California on October 23, 2026. The court docket classifies it as "Other Fraud" and lists the cause of action as "Diversity-Fraud". The complaint has not yet been read, so the specific allegations and the proposed class are not described here. This note will be replaced with a summary once the complaint is available.
Beaudoin v. US Trichology, LLC
This lawsuit was filed in District Court, D. Oregon on October 23, 2026. The court docket classifies it as "Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA)" and lists the cause of action as "Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment". The complaint has not yet been read, so the specific allegations and the proposed class are not described here. This note will be replaced with a summary once the complaint is available.
Newman v. JM Bullion, Inc.
This lawsuit was filed in District Court, N.D. Texas on October 22, 2026. The court docket classifies it as "Torts/Pers Inj: Other Personal Injury" and lists the cause of action as "Diversity-Personal Injury". The complaint has not yet been read, so the specific allegations and the proposed class are not described here. This note will be replaced with a summary once the complaint is available.
Vaughan v. Target Corporation
This lawsuit was filed in District Court, S.D. New York on October 22, 2026. The court docket classifies it as "P.I.: Other" and lists the cause of action as "Personal Injury". The complaint has not yet been read, so the specific allegations and the proposed class are not described here. This note will be replaced with a summary once the complaint is available.
Raul Torrez v. Indyke
This lawsuit was filed in District Court, D. New Mexico on October 21, 2026. The court docket classifies it as "Other Statutory Actions" and lists the cause of action as "Fed. Question". The complaint has not yet been read, so the specific allegations and the proposed class are not described here. This note will be replaced with a summary once the complaint is available.
Wineman v. Primal Nutrition, LLC
This lawsuit was filed in District Court, C.D. California on October 21, 2026. The court docket classifies it as "Other Fraud" and lists the cause of action as "Diversity-Fraud". The complaint has not yet been read, so the specific allegations and the proposed class are not described here. This note will be replaced with a summary once the complaint is available.
City of Phoenix v. REV Group LLC
This lawsuit was filed in District Court, E.D. Wisconsin on October 21, 2026. The court docket classifies it as "Anti-Trust" and lists the cause of action as "Antitrust Litigation". The complaint has not yet been read, so the specific allegations and the proposed class are not described here. This note will be replaced with a summary once the complaint is available.
Goss v. JM Bullion, Inc.
This lawsuit was filed in District Court, N.D. Texas on October 21, 2026. The court docket classifies it as "Contract: Other Contract" and lists the cause of action as "Diversity-Other Contract". The complaint has not yet been read, so the specific allegations and the proposed class are not described here. This note will be replaced with a summary once the complaint is available.
Lazyan v. Bank of America, N.A.
This lawsuit was filed in District Court, C.D. California on October 20, 2026. The court docket classifies it as "Consumer Credit" and lists the cause of action as "Fair Credit Reporting Act". The complaint has not yet been read, so the specific allegations and the proposed class are not described here. This note will be replaced with a summary once the complaint is available.
Williams v. Target Corporation
This lawsuit was filed in District Court, N.D. Illinois on October 20, 2026. The court docket classifies it as "Other Fraud" and lists the cause of action as "Diversity-Fraud". The complaint has not yet been read, so the specific allegations and the proposed class are not described here. This note will be replaced with a summary once the complaint is available.
Podorozhna v. Ubiquiti, Inc.
This lawsuit was filed in District Court, S.D. New York on October 20, 2026. The court docket classifies it as "P.I.: Other" and lists the cause of action as "Diversity Action". The complaint has not yet been read, so the specific allegations and the proposed class are not described here. This note will be replaced with a summary once the complaint is available.
Greve v. JM Bullion, Inc.
This lawsuit was filed in District Court, N.D. Texas on October 20, 2026. The court docket classifies it as "Contract: Other Contract" and lists the cause of action as "Diversity-Other Contract". The complaint has not yet been read, so the specific allegations and the proposed class are not described here. This note will be replaced with a summary once the complaint is available.
Bondi v. Dunkin' Brands, Inc.
This lawsuit was filed in District Court, D. Massachusetts on October 19, 2026. The court docket classifies it as "Other Statutory Actions" and lists the cause of action as "Fed. Question". The complaint has not yet been read, so the specific allegations and the proposed class are not described here. This note will be replaced with a summary once the complaint is available.
Deutsche Finance America LLC v. Bayerische Versorgungskammer
This lawsuit was filed in District Court, D. Delaware on October 16, 2026. The court docket classifies it as "Contract: Other" and lists the cause of action as "Breach of Contract". The complaint has not yet been read, so the specific allegations and the proposed class are not described here. This note will be replaced with a summary once the complaint is available.
MYERS v. REALPAGE, INC.
This lawsuit was filed in District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania on October 16, 2026. The court docket classifies it as "Other Statutes: Consumer Credit" and lists the cause of action as "Fair Credit Reporting Act". The complaint has not yet been read, so the specific allegations and the proposed class are not described here. This note will be replaced with a summary once the complaint is available.
CSRA Fleetcare Inc. v. Allied World Specialty Insurance Company
This lawsuit was filed in District Court, S.D. Georgia on October 16, 2026. The court docket classifies it as "Insurance" and lists the cause of action as "Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract". The complaint has not yet been read, so the specific allegations and the proposed class are not described here. This note will be replaced with a summary once the complaint is available.
Medina v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
This lawsuit was filed in District Court, N.D. Illinois on October 16, 2026. The court docket classifies it as "Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability" and lists the cause of action as "Diversity-Product Liability". The complaint has not yet been read, so the specific allegations and the proposed class are not described here. This note will be replaced with a summary once the complaint is available.
Duran v. Werner Enterprises Inc.
This lawsuit was filed in District Court, E.D. New York on October 15, 2026. The court docket classifies it as "Motor Vehicle" and lists the cause of action as "Notice of Removal". The complaint has not yet been read, so the specific allegations and the proposed class are not described here. This note will be replaced with a summary once the complaint is available.
Gambardella v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc.
This lawsuit was filed in District Court, S.D. New York on October 15, 2026. The court docket classifies it as "Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability" and lists the cause of action as "Diversity-Product Liability". The complaint has not yet been read, so the specific allegations and the proposed class are not described here. This note will be replaced with a summary once the complaint is available.
Douglas v. The Stop & Shop Supermarket Company, LLC
This lawsuit was filed in District Court, D. Massachusetts on October 15, 2026. The court docket classifies it as "Other Statutory Actions" and lists the cause of action as "Diversity-(Citizenship)". The complaint has not yet been read, so the specific allegations and the proposed class are not described here. This note will be replaced with a summary once the complaint is available.
Brand v. Utz Brands, Inc.
This lawsuit was filed in District Court, N.D. California on October 14, 2026. The court docket classifies it as "Other Fraud" and lists the cause of action as "Diversity-Fraud". The complaint has not yet been read, so the specific allegations and the proposed class are not described here. This note will be replaced with a summary once the complaint is available.