Elite Professional MMA Fighters allege that UFC illegally suppressed their wages by blocking other promoters from competing for their services and extracting one-sided concessions. UFC is the largest promoter of MMA events, with some 90% of the market, and has used its dominant position to demand exclusive contracts with fighters
“The UFC’s illegal acquisition and application of monopoly and monopsony power to suppress the wages of Elite Professional MMA fighters is inexcusable,” said Joseph Saveri, Co-Lead counsel for the plaintiffs. “Its exclusive contracts with fighters exclude other promoters from the market, putting them out of business or relegating them to second-tier status as a de facto farm system. The UFC has also acquired its market power by improperly acquiring its potential rivals. We are grateful to Judge Boulware for recognizing the importance of the class issues in this case, and for indicating his intention to grant class certification.”
UFC contracts typically offer poor wages, and claim exclusive rights to the fighters’ names and likenesses for marketing and merchandising in perpetuity—meaning that fighters do not receive royalties and cannot use their own names and hard-won recognition to promote personal ventures for the remainder of their lives.
Cung Le v. Zuffa, LLC, seeks treble damages under Section 2 of the Sherman Act, as well as injunctive relief for current and former Elite Professional MMA fighters. The case is pending in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada.
ABOUT THE FIRM
The Joseph Saveri Law Firm is one of the country’s most acclaimed, successful boutique firms, specializing in antitrust, class actions, and complex litigation on behalf of national and international consumers, purchasers, and employees across diverse industries. For further information on our practice and accomplishments on behalf of our clients, please visit www.saverilawfirm.com.
SOURCE Joseph Saveri Law Firm Inc